This entry was posted
on lørdag, maj 29th, 2010 at 01:05 and is filed under Ikke kategoriseret.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
25 Responses to “Bugatti Veyron vs Koenigsegg CCX MOSCOW UNLIM 500+ Moscow Unlim 500+”
@rmf09020
Where did you find all those information?
CCXR Trevita accelerates from 0 to300 and than brakes to 0 in 27.8 seconds, so that means that the CCXR trevita accelerates from 0 to 300 in arround 20+ seconds. That’s more than 3 seconds slower than the Veyron which accelerates 0-300 in 16.7 seconds!
@nex0801 your right but what about a roll on race then things would be different. The ccxr annihilates the veyron to 200.
ccxr 0-200 mph in 17 seconds
veyron 0-200 in 22 seconds
CCXR runs on E85 or E100!
The difference is about 2-3 lenghts at the end, but the Veyron driver isn’t using paddle shifts (the car has a turbo lag when it starts from 50) nor top speed mode and that’s way the difference isn’t bigger. If they started from 0 and if Veyron driver used launch control, the difference would be much bigger. And don’t forget that this Koenigsegg produces 900hp, not 806 like stock model.
I agree,and in “handling-mode” all that down force makes the Veyron a bit slower,if the spoiler was down Veyron would be more slipery and move smoother through the air!
I agree,and in “handling-mode” all that down force makes the Veyron a bit slower,if the spoiler was down Veyron would be more slipery and move smoother threw the air!
@Spiky86
True! In ˝handling-mode˝ Veyron is able to reach just 375 km/h! But with top speed key, the car lowers, spoiler goes down and that enables the Veyron to reach 407.5 km/h.
The owner of the Veyron did the run a bit wrong…the car was in “handling-mode”, look at the rear spoiler. If someone has the nervs to disagree, just look at Top Gear when James May drives the Veyron, and he shows that the rear spoiler is almost down when doing “topspeed-mode”. You need to put the key in the slot ate the sidedoor. You guys in Russia need to do a re-run, and show Veyrons TRUE potential.
@interista7878
Well, I am not sure, but I think that this Koenigsegg has 880hp, so it’s not stock 806hp…If they started from 0, and if the Veyron driver used launch control, the difference at the end would be much bigger, and don’t forger that Veyron weights 2 tons, or 800 kg more than a Koenigsegg…Trevita produces 1018 hp, but that’s when using bio fule…
Well, I am not sure, but I think that this Koenigsegg has 880hp, so it’s not stock 806hp…If they started from 0, and if the Veyron driver used launch control, the difference at the end would be much bigger, and don’t forger that Veyron weights 2 tons, or 800 kg more than a Koenigsegg…Trevita produces 1018 hp, but that’s when using bio fule…
@nex0801 The fact of the matter is that the Veyron just barely edges out on Koenigseggs 3:rd fastest current version (maybe even 4:th or 5:th depending on options) and that there is another 200 bhp waiting for it in Koenigseggs range of models. This is without even considering Koenigseggs confirmed 7-speed or it’s uncomfirmed but highly likely Agera bio-fuel version (1100-1200 bhp) or any other SUPER KOENIGSEGG the future may hold.
@interista7878
Mate, Veyron didn’t steal a car lenght at the start. Problem is stupid koenigsegg which has stupid RWD! agera, trevita, ccx, ccxr, ccxrlmg, ccxjoisdj… bla, bla, bla, bla…SOON COMES SUPER VEYRON WITH 200-300 EXTRA HP, AND 200KG LESS…so VEYRON IS THE GOD OF ALL CARS!!!
@rmf09020
Where did you find all those information?
CCXR Trevita accelerates from 0 to300 and than brakes to 0 in 27.8 seconds, so that means that the CCXR trevita accelerates from 0 to 300 in arround 20+ seconds. That’s more than 3 seconds slower than the Veyron which accelerates 0-300 in 16.7 seconds!
@MikoyanF29 not simply
@nex0801 your right but what about a roll on race then things would be different. The ccxr annihilates the veyron to 200.
ccxr 0-200 mph in 17 seconds
veyron 0-200 in 22 seconds
@zzztroper that wasn’t the ccxr
@wr1swd84
STFU, that fat pos barely beat an 850-900bhp CCX. The 1018bhp CCXR will simply shit on it.
No point in arguing with me kid.
@MikoyanF29 well what race were you watching fucking retard..veyron blew it away you dick..oh and veyron spoiler was up..big difference..haha prick
@MikoyanF29 ccxr doesnt stand a change with a veyron, gtr35 800p beat the ccxr and the veyron beat the same car pretty easy
koenigsegg did amazing!
Koenigsegg sounds better
@MikoyanF29
CCXR runs on E85 or E100!
The difference is about 2-3 lenghts at the end, but the Veyron driver isn’t using paddle shifts (the car has a turbo lag when it starts from 50) nor top speed mode and that’s way the difference isn’t bigger. If they started from 0 and if Veyron driver used launch control, the difference would be much bigger. And don’t forget that this Koenigsegg produces 900hp, not 806 like stock model.
@MikoyanF29
Nope, Veyron still has better acceleration time than CCXR!!!
CCXR:
0-100: 3.1
0-200: 8.9
Veyron:
0-100: 2.7 (factory 2.5)
0-200: 7.4 (factory 7.3)
This race confirms what I knew all along…Veyron doesn’t stand a chance against CCXR.
@Spiky86
I agree,and in “handling-mode” all that down force makes the Veyron a bit slower,if the spoiler was down Veyron would be more slipery and move smoother through the air!
@Spiky86
I agree,and in “handling-mode” all that down force makes the Veyron a bit slower,if the spoiler was down Veyron would be more slipery and move smoother threw the air!
@Spiky86
True! In ˝handling-mode˝ Veyron is able to reach just 375 km/h! But with top speed key, the car lowers, spoiler goes down and that enables the Veyron to reach 407.5 km/h.
The owner of the Veyron did the run a bit wrong…the car was in “handling-mode”, look at the rear spoiler. If someone has the nervs to disagree, just look at Top Gear when James May drives the Veyron, and he shows that the rear spoiler is almost down when doing “topspeed-mode”. You need to put the key in the slot ate the sidedoor. You guys in Russia need to do a re-run, and show Veyrons TRUE potential.
@interista7878
Well, I am not sure, but I think that this Koenigsegg has 880hp, so it’s not stock 806hp…If they started from 0, and if the Veyron driver used launch control, the difference at the end would be much bigger, and don’t forger that Veyron weights 2 tons, or 800 kg more than a Koenigsegg…Trevita produces 1018 hp, but that’s when using bio fule…
Well, I am not sure, but I think that this Koenigsegg has 880hp, so it’s not stock 806hp…If they started from 0, and if the Veyron driver used launch control, the difference at the end would be much bigger, and don’t forger that Veyron weights 2 tons, or 800 kg more than a Koenigsegg…Trevita produces 1018 hp, but that’s when using bio fule…
@interista7878 *900 bhp CCXF. My mistake. Still only 3:rd fastest version though.
@nex0801 The fact of the matter is that the Veyron just barely edges out on Koenigseggs 3:rd fastest current version (maybe even 4:th or 5:th depending on options) and that there is another 200 bhp waiting for it in Koenigseggs range of models. This is without even considering Koenigseggs confirmed 7-speed or it’s uncomfirmed but highly likely Agera bio-fuel version (1100-1200 bhp) or any other SUPER KOENIGSEGG the future may hold.
We can agree they’re both amazing cars though.
И чем дело закончилось?
@interista7878 Agreed.
@interista7878
I am sure that Veyron would beat ccxr and agera. Veyron has better acceleration from 0-100, 0-200, 0-300, 0-400…so it’s simple maths…
@interista7878
Mate, Veyron didn’t steal a car lenght at the start. Problem is stupid koenigsegg which has stupid RWD! agera, trevita, ccx, ccxr, ccxrlmg, ccxjoisdj… bla, bla, bla, bla…SOON COMES SUPER VEYRON WITH 200-300 EXTRA HP, AND 200KG LESS…so VEYRON IS THE GOD OF ALL CARS!!!
Congrats!